In the spectrum of transfer pricing methods, the Cost Plus Method (CPM) holds a vital role, especially for companies operating in the manufacturing and service sectors. As one of the "Traditional Transaction Methods", CPM is considered more direct in reflecting the relationship between production costs and expected profit compared to transactional profit-based methods (such as TNMM).
However, CPM application is often deceptive; appearing simple on the surface (cost plus profit), yet harboring high complexity regarding accounting consistency.
The Cost Plus Method (CPM) is a transfer pricing determination method carried out by adding a fair gross profit mark-up obtained by a comparable manufacturer or service provider to the cost of goods sold (cost base) of the goods or services.
CPM looks at transaction fairness from the perspective of the goods or service provider (seller). The logic is that in an independent transaction, a producer or service provider expects to cover all its production costs (direct and indirect costs) and obtain an additional profit (mark-up) that is fair as compensation for the functions performed and risks assumed.
Based on MoF Regulation (PMK) 172 of 2023, CPM is defined as a method carried out by adding a fair gross profit level for a manufacturer or service provider to the cost of goods sold of the goods or services.
Not all transactions are suitable for using CPM. Based on the The Most Appropriate Method principle, CPM is ideally used for:
CPM is less appropriate if it involves unique intangible assets or if the producer assumes full market risk (fully fledged manufacturer).
The core of CPM is the determination of the Cost Base (Cost Base) and Gross Profit Mark-up (Gross Profit Mark-up).
The calculation basis is usually production cost (direct + indirect production costs), excluding operating expenses (SG&A).
This mark-up is obtained from:
The biggest challenge of CPM is ensuring accounting consistency. Differences in how costs are recorded can significantly distort analysis results. OECD TPG 2022 and UN Manual 2021 emphasize the importance of uniformity in cost classification between COGS and Operating Expenses.
In CPM, functional comparability is prioritized over product comparability. Two different products can be compared provided the production process and functional complexity are comparable. However, efficiency differences must not be ignored; manufacturers that are more efficient are entitled to a higher mark-up.
PT Komponen Indo (Taxpayer) manufactures components with COGS of Rp 1,000 and actual Mark-up of 10% (Price Rp 1,100). QC costs are recorded in COGS.
PT Rival (Comparable) has a Mark-up of 30% (COGS Rp 2,000, Profit Rp 600). However, QC costs of Rp 100 are recorded in Operating Expenses.
Adjustment to PT Rival:
Fair Selling Price: Rp 1,000 + (23.8% x Rp 1,000) = Rp 1,238.
Result: The Taxpayer's actual price (Rp 1,100) is below fair value. A positive correction occurs.
The Cost Plus Method (CPM) is a powerful tool for manufacturing and services, provided it is used with high discipline regarding accounting details. The key to success lies in the accurate identification of the cost base, consistency of cost treatment, and understanding of functions/risks. If detailed comparable cost data is difficult to access, consider other methods such as TNMM with the Net Cost-Plus Mark-up indicator.
Is My Company Required to Create a Transfer Pricing Document?