In the Indonesian tax ecosystem, which adheres to the self-assessment system, the state places full trust in Taxpayers to calculate, pay, and report their tax obligations independently. However, this trust is balanced by a strict supervision mechanism (compliance risk management) to ensure fairness and certainty in state revenue. The primary instrument used by the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) to bridge the data held by authorities with Taxpayer reporting is the Request for Explanation on Data and/or Information (SP2DK).
The issuance of an SP2DK often causes anxiety for Taxpayers. However, based on the latest regulations, specifically Minister of Finance Regulation (PMK) Number 111 of 2025, Director General of Taxes Regulation Number PER-18/PJ/2025, and Circular Letter Number SE-05/PJ/2022, SP2DK is essentially a space for dialogue and guidance. SP2DK is neither a tax assessment letter nor a verdict of guilt, but rather an invitation for clarification before the DGT moves to more formal audit actions.
This article will outline comprehensive, strategic, and tactical steps for Taxpayers in responding to SP2DK, from receiving the letter to the final resolution, to mitigate the risk of disputes and administrative sanctions.
The first step upon receiving an SP2DK is to conduct a thorough verification. SP2DK can be delivered through various channels: electronically (DJP Online account), post/expedition, facsimile, or delivered directly via an officer's visit. Taxpayers must ensure the validity of the letter, including checking the letter number, date of issuance, and sender identity.
It is crucial for Taxpayers to read the delivered SP2DK carefully. Do not panic. Pay attention to the following details:
Time management is vital. Based on Article 6 of PMK 111 of 2025, Taxpayers are obliged to provide a response.
Taxpayers must submit the explanation on time, which is within a maximum of 14 (fourteen) days from the date sent, date of issuance (if electronic), or date of direct delivery. Ignoring this deadline is very risky. If the Taxpayer does not respond within the specified time, the DGT may assume the Taxpayer agrees with the data, or follow up with a Visit, or even recommend an Audit or Preliminary Evidence Audit.
If the requested data is complex and takes longer to collect, the regulation provides flexibility. Taxpayers may request an extension for submitting a response for a maximum of 7 (seven) days after the initial period ends. This extension notification must be submitted in writing to the KPP before the initial deadline expires.
After understanding the letter and deadlines, Taxpayers must enter the technical analysis stage. The response to an SP2DK depends on the matching results (reconciliation) between the Taxpayer's internal data and the data presented by the DGT.
To support arguments, Taxpayers are strongly advised to perform equalization or other testing techniques. Equalization is the process of reconciling one type of tax data with other tax data or accounting data to test consistency. For example:
Based on the equalization results, Taxpayers must compile the explanation with relevant data/evidence.
In the era of tax administration digitalization, Taxpayers have flexible options for submitting responses, as regulated in PMK 111 of 2025:
If the written explanation is deemed insufficient, or if there are differences of opinion, the DGT may invite the Taxpayer for a Discussion. In this forum:
After the clarification process is complete, the Head of KPP will issue a Report on Request for Explanation on Data and/or Information (LHP2DK).
This is a crucial closing step. If the process is finished, the Taxpayer must ensure that a Notification Letter on the Progress of Request for Explanation (SP3 P2DK) has been issued. The SP3 P2DK is a formal document providing legal certainty that the data is considered clear, so the Taxpayer is no longer overshadowed by audit risks on the same data.
Responding to an SP2DK requires calmness, precision, and a good understanding of the law. With the enactment of PMK 111 of 2025, supervision procedures have become more structured. The key to facing an SP2DK is being cooperative, transparent, and utilizing the right to provide clarification. A proper response turns SP2DK into a tool for compliance improvement (self-correction), rather than a threat.