In the self-assessment tax system adopted by Indonesia, voluntary compliance is the primary foundation. However, to maintain public trust and the integrity of the system, the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) has the authority to conduct law enforcement actions through tax examinations (audits) [Blue Book, Chapter 1].
The starting point of the formal interaction between the tax authority (fiskus) and the Taxpayer in an audit is not when the Tax Assessment Letter (SKP) is issued, but when the Audit Warrant (SP2) is issued and the Notification of Tax Examination is delivered. Understanding this procedure is crucial, especially with the enactment of the latest regulation Minister of Finance Regulation Number 15 of 2025 (PMK 15/2025), which integrates the audit business process with the core tax administration system (Coretax System).
This article will delve deeply into the mechanism of delivering these two vital documents, ranging from the legal basis and technical execution to strategic implications for Taxpayers.
Based on the Law on General Provisions and Tax Procedures (UU KUP), an audit is conducted by authorized officers equipped with an Audit Warrant [SDSN UU KUP 2023, Article 29].
In PMK 15 of 2025, there is a clear distinction between these two documents:
Hierarchically, the SP2 is issued first based on an audit instruction or approval, and then the Notification of Tax Examination is created and delivered to the Taxpayer [SE-15/PJ/2018, Attachment II].
The SP2 is issued by the Head of the Audit Implementation Unit (UP2). In practice, one SP2 can be issued for one or several tax periods, parts of a tax year, or tax years [PMK 15 Year 2025, Article 9 paragraph 1]. If there is a change in the audit team composition, the Head of UP2 is obliged to issue an Amended SP2 (SP2 Perubahan) [PMK 15 Year 2025, Article 9 paragraph 2].
The SP2 format contains crucial information such as:
This document is the first "face" of the audit for the Taxpayer. In accordance with transparency principles, the Notification of Tax Examination must be delivered to the Taxpayer.
Specifically for Compliance Testing Audits with the Focused Audit Type (Pemeriksaan Terfokus) (one of the new audit types in the Coretax era), this notification letter must be accompanied by a written notification regarding specific items in the Tax Return or specific data that will be audited [PMK 15 Year 2025, Article 8 paragraph 2 letter b; Slides PMK 15/2025, Page 23].
One of the significant changes in PMK 15 of 2025 is the adaptation to technology.
Delivery of documents related to the audit, including the Notification of Tax Examination, can be done via:
Although electronic delivery is regulatory possible, in practical discussions (as revealed in the IAI Regular Tax Discussion), it is recommended that the delivery of the Notification of Tax Examination remains through physical channels (Registered Mail or Courier Service) or delivered directly.
This is because the date this letter is received has vital legal implications, namely as the "Audit Start Date" which becomes the start date for calculating the Testing Period [Transcript Video IAI, Minute 504].
After the Notification of Tax Examination is delivered, standard procedure (especially for complex audits) requires an initial meeting.
Examiner's Obligations: When meeting the Taxpayer, the Tax Examiner must show:
Taxpayer's Rights: The Taxpayer has the right to request an explanation regarding the reasons and objectives of the audit. This meeting is utilized to:
The Notification of Tax Examination must be delivered to the correct party to be legally valid. The parties who can receive it are:
What happens if the Taxpayer refuses to receive the Notification of Tax Examination or refuses to be audited? The Tax Examiner will create a Minutes of Refusal of Examination [PMK 15 Year 2025, Attachments G & H].
The consequences are severe:
The delivery of the SP2 and Notification of Tax Examination is a crucial point in the cycle of tax rights and obligations. Receipt of this letter is a signal to immediately conduct audit readiness. In the era of PMK 15 of 2025, transparency is emphasized, but adherence to formal procedures remains the key to the validity of tax legal products.