In the Indonesian tax system, disputes between Taxpayers and the tax authorities (fiskus/Directorate General of Taxes/DJP) often originate from the issuance of a Tax Assessment Notice (SKP) resulting from an audit where the value or material is not agreed upon by the Taxpayer. As a form of protection for Taxpayer rights, the Law provides room to file an administrative legal remedy called an Objection.
The objection process is not merely filing a letter of rejection. Within it, there are strict technical mechanisms, ranging from formal research and material proof to quality assurance mechanisms through tiered discussions. This article will thoroughly outline the technical mechanism for the settlement of objections by the DJP, referring to the Law on General Provisions and Tax Procedures (UU KUP), Government Regulation Number 50 of 2022, Minister of Finance Regulation Number 118 of 2024, as well as various technical implementing regulations.
The objection settlement process begins when the objection letter is received by the DJP. In accordance with Minister of Finance Regulation Number 118 of 2024, the Taxpayer files an objection in writing in the Indonesian language by stating the amount of tax payable or amount of loss according to the Taxpayer's calculation accompanied by clear reasons.
Before entering the substance of the dispute, the Objection Research Implementation Unit will conduct strict formal research. Based on SE-11/PJ/2014, the Objection Research Team must ensure:
If these formal requirements are not met, the letter is not an objection letter so it cannot be considered.
After the formal requirements are met, the DJP has 12 (twelve) months to resolve the objection. Within this period, the Objection Research Team works to test the material truth of the dispute.
The first technical step taken by the Research Team is to compile an Objection Dispute Matrix. This document maps the examiner's corrections, the examiner's reasons, the Taxpayer's objection reasons, and the Research Team's initial opinion.
The Research Team is authorized to borrow books, records, data, and information. The Taxpayer is required to lend the requested documents no later than 15 (fifteen) working days after the request letter is sent.
Note: According to Article 26A paragraph (4) of the KUP Law, data requested at the time of audit but not provided by the Taxpayer, cannot be considered in the settlement of the objection.
If the dispute requires external confirmation (e.g., banks or suppliers), the Research Team is authorized to request evidence from third parties to ensure validity objectively.
This is an internal DJP quality control layer to ensure objection decisions are made objectively and accountably, especially for large-value or strategic cases.
Discussion is mandatory if the submission meets the criteria:
The results of the discussion are set forth in the Minutes of Discussion Meeting which become the main consideration material for the final decision.
Before issuing a decision, the DJP is required to request the Taxpayer to present themselves via SPUH, attached with the List of Objection Research Results.
The DJP has four decision options:
1. Grant entirely: All arguments are proven correct.
2. Grant partially: Some corrections are proven incorrect.
3. Reject: Arguments are groundless.
4. Increase the amount of tax: New data found indicating larger tax payable.
Warning: If rejected or granted partially, the Taxpayer is subject to a fine of 30%. This is not imposed if an Appeal is filed.