In the dynamics of tax audits, differences of opinion often occur between the Taxpayer and the Tax Auditor regarding the amount of tax payable. These differences are then set forth in a Tax Assessment Notice (SKP). However, in a self-assessment system that upholds justice, the Law grants the Taxpayer the right to file a legal remedy of Objection.
A crucial issue that is often questioned is the status of the "tax debt" regarding the disputed value. Must the Taxpayer pay off the entire fiscal assessment before filing an objection? How does the legal hierarchy from the Law to Minister Regulations govern it? This article will thoroughly review the status of tax debt and administrative sanctions based on the KUP Law, Government Regulation (PP) 50 of 2022, and the latest implementing regulation PMK 118 of 2024.
Tax regulations distinguish the treatment between the tax amount agreed upon and not agreed upon by the Taxpayer at the time of the final discussion of audit results (Closing Conference).
An absolute requirement for an objection to be processed is strictly regulated in Article 25 paragraph (3a) of the KUP Law. The Taxpayer must pay off the tax still to be paid at least in the amount that has been agreed upon in the final discussion before the objection letter is submitted. This provision is detailed in Article 10 paragraph (2) letter d of PMK 118 of 2024; if not met, the objection cannot be considered.
Regarding the tax amount not agreed upon (material of dispute), the law provides protection in the form of payment deferral. Based on Article 25 paragraph (7) of the KUP Law and Article 48 paragraph (1) of PP 50 of 2022, such amount is not a tax debt until the issuance of the Objection Decision Letter.
The legal implications of this rule are:
The payment deferral facility is balanced with the risk of fine sanctions to prevent groundless filings. If the objection is rejected or granted partially, the Taxpayer is subject to a fine of 30% (thirty percent) based on Article 25 paragraph (9) of the KUP Law.
In accordance with Article 25 paragraph (10) of the KUP Law, the 30% fine is not imposed if the Taxpayer submits an Appeal application to the Tax Court. However, the risk shifts to a 60% fine sanction if the appeal is later rejected.
[Image comparing tax objection and appeal sanctions in Indonesia]
The "deferred" status has a repayment time limit as follows:
Based on Articles 55 - 59 of PMK 118 of 2024, withdrawal of an objection before the SPUH has serious legal consequences:
Therefore, Taxpayers must be careful: pay off the agreed tax as a formal requirement, and maturely calculate the risk of interest accumulation before deciding to withdraw an objection.