Errors in recording the taxpayer’s identity on the payment slip became the starting point of the dispute between PT TSP and the DGT regarding Article 22 Income Tax for the Tax Period of July 2021. The tax auditor found that the tax amount claimed as a credit in the Tax Return—Rp3.950.517.891,00—did not appear in the MPN database under PT TSP. Instead, all payments with the same amount were recorded as deposits made by PT GBU, leading the DGT to conclude that PT TSP had no legal basis to credit the tax payment
In its rebuttal, PT TSP emphasized that the company had fulfilled its obligation to withhold and remit the tax. Bank transfer evidence from PT TSP’s account, coal purchase documents, withholding slips, and bank statements were provided to support the assertion that the payment was made by PT TSP. According to the company, the issue arose from an administrative mistake in completing the tax payment slip (SSP), causing the payment to be recorded under PT GBU. PT TSP further explained that a rebooking request (PBK) had already been submitted to correct the error and reassign the payment to the proper taxpayer.
Upon reviewing the case file, the Tax Court Panel identified that the core issue lay in the formal accuracy of the payment record. Regardless of who transferred the funds, all official entries in the MPN system listed PT GBU as the payer. No payment record existed under PT TSP for the same amount. Since the PBK request had not been approved by the DGT, the Panel concluded that the payment could not yet be treated as PT TSP’s tax credit. The Panel emphasized that eligibility for tax crediting requires correct taxpayer identification, not merely the existence of a valid NTPN or the fact that the funds were received by the state treasury.
Further examination confirmed that the entire amount corrected by the DGT—Rp3.950.517.891,00—had not legally transferred as PT TSP’s right in the absence of an approved PBK. The Panel also noted that PT TSP remained entitled to resubmit the PBK request so that the payment might be utilized in later tax periods, though not as a credit in the current dispute.
By upholding the DGT’s correction in full, the Panel determined that the remaining tax payable amounted to Rp5.364.803.296,00, including interest sanctions. In conclusion, PT TSP’s appeal was fully rejected, reaffirming that administrative accuracy is a fundamental requirement for recognizing Article 22 Income Tax credits.
Comprehensive Analysis and Tax Court Decision on This Case Available Here