The correction of interest expenses amounting to IDR 539,141,026 by the Respondent was based on the argument that the loan did not meet the criteria for obtaining, collecting, and maintaining income (3M) as stipulated in Article 6 paragraph (1) of the Income Tax Law. The Respondent utilized a matching cost against revenue approach, claiming that the Petitioner had idle funds in the form of deposits and provided interest-free loans to affiliates, thus economically rendering the third-party interest expense irrelevant to taxable operations.
The core conflict in this case centered on the interpretation of SE-46/PJ.4/1995. The Respondent believed that the existence of deposits and interest-free receivables automatically disqualified the interest expense deduction. Conversely, PT IL asserted that the loan was drawn purely for working capital and that there was no direct link between the loan funds and the deposit placement, which was merely temporary for liquidity management.
The Board of Judges, in its legal considerations, ruled that the Respondent failed to prove a specific cash flow (tracing) showing that the loan funds were diverted specifically for deposits or affiliate loans. The Board emphasized that as long as the loan is genuinely used for general company operations, the interest expense is a legitimate deduction from gross income. Regarding interest-free affiliate receivables, the Board opined that tax authorities should perform an adjustment on interest income (implied interest) on the revenue side, rather than eliminating interest expenses on the cost side.
The implication of this decision provides legal certainty for Taxpayers that interest expense deductions cannot be corrected arbitrarily just because of deposit balances or affiliate receivables. This ruling emphasizes the importance of concrete evidence and the principle that corrections must target the correct object according to economic substance. In conclusion, as long as the Taxpayer can prove the utilization of the loan for operations (3M), the right to deduct interest expenses remains legally protected.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here
tpc.consulting 
tpc.consulting 
info@taxindo.co.id