The Respondent's adjustment of the VAT Base (DPP) for the January 2018 Tax Period against PT MI was based on the results of revenue equity data between the audited Financial Statements and the VAT Returns. Tax authorities assumed that the unreported revenue difference in the VAT Return constituted domestic deliveries subject to VAT. However, the core of this conflict is rooted in the timing difference of revenue recognition between commercial accounting standards, which use the accrual basis when goods leave the warehouse, and tax regulations that refer to the registration date of the Export Declaration (PEB).
During the hearing, PT MI successfully proved that the difference of IDR 14,717,375,328 was not a hidden local delivery but an export transaction reported in a different tax period according to the PEB validation date by Customs. The Board of Judges, in its legal consideration, emphasized that in export disputes, formal evidence in the form of PEB documents that have received export approval is absolute evidence that invalidates the Respondent's assumptions.
The resolution of this case ended with the full granting of PT MI's appeal because the Board assessed that there were no unreported tax objects. The implication of this decision reinforces the importance of meticulous administration of export documents as the primary shield against revenue equity-based adjustments.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here