In accordance with Article 7 paragraph (2) of the VAT Law, the export of Taxable Goods (BKP) and Taxable Services (JKP) is explicitly subject to a VAT rate of 0% to support national export competitiveness. This dispute centers on a positive correction of the VAT Tax Base (DPP) amounting to IDR 138 million, made by the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) against PT HWH for handling cost revenue, which the DGT classified as a supply of Taxable Services (JKP) within the Customs Area subject to 10% VAT.
The DGT argued that the handling cost revenue, recorded as freight income, constituted a domestic supply of JKP, not part of the BKP Export Value subject to 0% VAT. The DGT highlighted administrative formalities, such as the VAT invoices from the domestic service provider being issued in the name of the Taxpayer (WP) rather than the foreign buyer, and the presence of a margin (markup) between the amount charged to the buyer and the cost incurred by the WP. The DGT used these findings to conclude that the service supply occurred经历 domestically and must be subject to 10% VAT.
Conversely, PT HWH (WP) firmly defended its position based on the economic substance and the VAT Destination Principle. The WP asserted that the handling cost is an inseparable component of the export sales price, as defined in Article 1 Number 26 of the VAT Law, which stipulates that Export Value includes all costs demanded or expected to be demanded by the exporter. Crucially, the benefit of the service was realized by the buyer outside the Customs Area, meaning that under the destination principle, the VAT rate must be 0%.
The Tax Court Panel, after considering the facts and evidence, unequivocally ruled in favor of the WP. In its decision, the Panel emphasized that the primary focus of VAT is the material place of consumption. Since the recipient and beneficiary of the handling cost service is the customer residing outside the Customs Area and lacking a Permanent Establishment (PE) in Indonesia, the supply must substantively be treated as an export of JKP or part of the BKP Export Value, subject to 0% VAT in accordance with Article 7 paragraph (2) of the VAT Law.
The Panel disregarded the DGT's formal arguments regarding the profit margin or local vendor invoice issuance, deeming them irrelevant to the essence of the ancillary logistics service being consumed abroad. Consequently, the DGT's VAT DPP correction of IDR 138,953,264 was officially nullified in its entirety by the Tax Court Panel.
This ruling carries significant implications for Indonesian exporters. Firstly, it reinforces the position that in VAT disputes, economic substance and the destination principle must prevail over rigid administrative formalities. Secondly, the presence of a profit margin in costs recharged (re-invoiced) to a foreign buyer does not automatically reclassify the item from an Export Value component (0% VAT) to a domestic JKP (10% VAT), provided the operational objective is directly linked to the export workflow.
This establishes an important jurisprudence highlighting the need for corporate tax teams to meticulously evaluate international commercial agreements (Incoterms). Exporters are advised to breakdown ancillary expenses—such as handling, trucking, and freight fees—either directly inside the primary commercial invoice or via a supporting worksheet that systematically ties these expenditures to the official Export Declaration (PEB) documentation, neutralizing arbitrary domestic reclassifications during revenue audits.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here
tpc.consulting 
tpc.consulting 
info@taxindo.co.id