PT SAR faced a litigation challenge when the tax authority corrected the Article 22 Income Tax withholding object regarding the purchase of Fresh Fruit Bunches (FFB) from a Farmer Group (Poktan). The core of the conflict lies in the validity of using a Government Regulation (PP) 23/2018 Tax Certificate held personally by the group's chairperson to exempt the tax withholding obligations of the group as an organization. The Respondent argued that formally, the tax subject involved in the transaction was the farmer group; therefore, a certificate under an individual's name cannot mitigate the 0.25% tax withholding requirement.
The Petitioner attempted to convince the Tax Court that the farmer group is not a legal entity, and thus all tax matters are administratively represented by its chairperson. However, in its resolution, the Board of Judges emphasized the principle of strict law in taxation. The Court held that tax facilities are specific and attached to the Taxpayer Identification Number (NPWP) stated in the certificate. Since the Sahata Farmer Group was considered a different entity from Mr. Sianipar Maruhum, the 0.5% final tax rate facility could not be applied to the transaction.
The implications of this ruling provide a crucial lesson for manufacturing or industrial companies sourcing agricultural products. Companies must ensure that the counterparty, especially farmer groups or cooperatives, possesses tax legality that matches the identity on the invoice and the Tax Certificate. Misidentification of the tax subject can lead to the company bearing the tax liability and its associated administrative sanctions.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here