The provisions of Article 21 paragraph (1) letter e of the Income Tax Law and PER-11/PJ/2015 became the epicenter of the dispute between tax authorities and e-commerce platform providers regarding the classification of loyalty coins as tax withholding objects. The dispute originated from the Respondent's correction of the S&M-Coin account, which was considered a gift related to activities that increased the recipient's economic capacity. However, legal facts demonstrate that these coins are marketing instruments inherently linked to sales transactions.
The core of the conflict began when the Respondent performed cost equalization and concluded that awarding coins to users—through daily logins, games, and product reviews—constituted service compensation or gifts qualifying as Income Tax Article 21 objects. Conversely, PT SII as the Appellant emphasized that these coins are loyalty points that cannot be converted into cash and only function as price reducers (discounts) for subsequent transactions, thus classifying them as direct gifts exempted from Article 21 withholding under applicable technical regulations.
The Board of Judges, in its legal considerations, provided a resolution favoring legal certainty for business actors. The Board assessed that the coins were provided directly to all users without a draw and required a purchase transaction to be utilized. Pursuant to Article 4 paragraph (2) of PER-11/PJ/2015, direct gifts in the sale of goods or services given to all end-consumers without a draw are not subject to Article 21 withholding. The Board was convinced that the relationship between the platform and the user in providing these coins does not constitute an "organizer and participant" relationship as intended by PMK 252/PMK.03/2008.
The implications of this verdict are crucial for the digital industry in Indonesia, providing confirmation that point-based loyalty programs are not Income Tax Article 21 withholding objects as long as direct gift criteria are met. This decision also serves as a reminder for tax authorities to be more cautious in performing cost equalization without delving into the economic and technical substance of digital transactions. This victory strengthens the Taxpayer's position in maintaining the argument that discounts or price reductions, in any form (including coins), do not automatically become income tax objects at the end-user level.
Overall, this case serves as an important jurisprudence clarifying the boundary between activity-based rewards and sales promotion strategies. The ruling confirms that as long as the instrument functions as a price reducer and is provided mass-scale without a lottery, there is no obligation for Article 21 withholding for the platform provider.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here
tpc.consulting 
tpc.consulting 
info@taxindo.co.id