The Director General of Taxes (Respondent) implemented a significant correction to PT JP's Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) for the 2019 Tax Year, amounting to USD 38,044,791, based on the Arm's Length Principle (ALP). This adjustment led to an increase in net income subject to Corporate Income Tax, triggering a complex dispute over related-party transaction values within the transfer pricing domain. PT JP filed an appeal with the Tax Court after its initial objection was rejected, arguing that the reported COGS aligned with market conditions and the company’s transfer pricing documentation.
The core conflict centered on differences in methodology and comparables used by the tax authorities to test the fairness of acquisition prices between group entities. However, during the trial process, a significant development occurred as both parties (the Indonesian tax authority and the partner country's tax authority) reached a settlement through the Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) in February 2025. MAP serves as an international administrative channel designed to avoid double taxation arising from transfer pricing adjustments.
In its legal considerations, the Board of Judges referred to Article 39 of the Tax Court Law, which governs the Petitioner's right to withdraw an appeal. Given that the substance of the dispute had been resolved via mutual agreement (MAP) and the Respondent expressed no objection, the Board of Judges granted the withdrawal request. This decision reaffirms that settlements within the MAP forum hold substantial weight in terminating domestic disputes, resulting in the case being removed from the official docket.
The implications of this ruling provide legal certainty for taxpayers that MAP can serve as an effective solution running parallel to litigation, ultimately offering a more consolidated outcome for multinational enterprises. The successful resolution via MAP highlights the importance of an integrated litigation strategy that balances domestic legal routes with international tax treaties (P3B). In conclusion, withdrawing an appeal based on MAP is a recognized procedural efficiency to achieve administrative justice without awaiting a material verdict from the Board.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here
tpc.consulting 
tpc.consulting 
info@taxindo.co.id