Income Tax Equalization Cannot Serve as the Sole Basis for VAT Correction Without Evidence of Actual Delivery

Tax Court Appeal Decision | PPN | Fully Granted

PUT-000026.16/2024/PP/M.XIVA for 2025

Taxindo Prime Consulting
Monday, July 20, 2026 | 09:37 WIB
00:00
Optimized with Google Chrome
Income Tax Equalization Cannot Serve as the Sole Basis for VAT Correction Without Evidence of Actual Delivery

PT BS Tax Dispute: Annulment of VAT Base Correction Based on Gross Profit Margin Assumptions

The tax dispute between PT BS and the Directorate General of Taxation (DGT) reached a decisive turning point when the Board of Judges annulled a VAT base correction amounting to IDR 295 billion. The core conflict originated from the Respondent's adjustment of the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) in Corporate Income Tax, subsequently applying a 20.85% Gross Profit Margin (GPM) method to assume unreported additional turnover in the VAT Return for December 2020. The DGT argued that the Taxpayer's failure to adequately prove ending inventory values empowered examiners to utilize indirect methods pursuant to PER-23/PJ/2013.

PT BS's Refutation: VAT as an Objective Tax Predicated on Actual Delivery

However, PT BS rigorously refuted this assumption by presenting material evidence, including general ledgers, invoices, and independent auditor reports with an Unqualified Opinion. The Petitioner emphasized that VAT is an objective tax that must be predicated on the legal event of the actual delivery of Taxable Goods under Article 4 paragraph (1) of the VAT Law, rather than mathematical profit calculations or mere equalization.

Judicial Considerations: Equalization Tools and the Burden of Proof

In its legal considerations, the Board of Judges provided a fundamental resolution for legal certainty: equalization is merely a supporting tool (testing means) and does not constitute a legal basis for delivery. The Board underscored that since the Respondent could not provide evidence of the flow of goods, contracts, or invoices proving actual delivery to third parties, the correction must be overturned. This ruling reinforces the critical implication that the burden of proof regarding the occurrence of delivery rests with the tax authorities when asserting a VAT underpayment. In conclusion, indirect methods cannot override the physical facts of delivery within the VAT regime.

A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here


August 05, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | PPN | Partially Granted

PUT-007016.162024PPM.XVIIIB Year 2025

August 05, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | Income Tax Articles 23/26 (Final) | Partially Granted

PUT-007041.122024PPM.XVIIIB Year 2025

August 05, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | Annual Corporate Income Tax | Partially Granted

PUT-007042.122024PPM.XVIIIB Year 2025

August 05, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | Annual Corporate Income Tax | Partially Granted

PUT-007239.15/2023/PP/M.XIVA Year 2024

August 05, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | PPN | Fully Granted

PUT-007248.162023PPM.XIVA Year 2024

August 05, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | Income Tax Articles 23/26 (Final) | To Reject the Appeal/ Lawsuit

PUT-009965.132022PPM.IIB Year 2025

August 04, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | Annual Corporate Income Tax | Fully Granted

PUT-010300.252023PPM.XIIIB Year 2025

August 04, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | Annual Corporate Income Tax | Partially Granted

PUT-010310.15/2021/PP/M.VIIIA Year 2025

August 04, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | PPN | Fully Granted

PUT-010314.16/2021/PP/M.VIIIA Year 2025

August 04, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | PPN | Partially Granted

PUT-010315.162021PPM.VIIIA Year 2025

Article More Details
August 24, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting | Adv Muhammad Faiz Nur Abshar, S.H. - Lilik F Pracaya, Ak., CA., ME., BKP (C)

August 24, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting | Adv Muhammad Faiz Nur Abshar, S.H. - Lilik F Pracaya, Ak., CA., ME., BKP (C)

August 24, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting | Adv Muhammad Faiz Nur Abshar, S.H. - Lilik F Pracaya, Ak., CA., ME., BKP (C)

Taxindo Prime Consulting (TPC) is a firm specializing in tax, accounting, business, and business law consulting.
Taxindo Prime Consulting (TPC) is established as a trusted strategic partner, providing comprehensive solutions in tax consulting, accounting, business development, and business law. Driven by a commitment to integrity and professionalism, TPC is dedicated to delivering more than just standard consultation; we provide education, tactical advice, and concrete solutions. Our services are meticulously designed to analyze and resolve clients' tax and business challenges with objectivity, in-depth insight, and full independence, ensuring both regulatory compliance and long-term business sustainability.
OFFICE
Mega Plaza Building 12th Floor
Jl. H.R. Rasuna Said Kav C-3 Jakarta 12940

Phone :
+62 21 521 2686
+62 817 001 3303

Email :
info@taxindo.co.id
Copyright © 2026 Taxindo Prime Consulting

All content on this website is provided solely for general informational and educational purposes. This information is not intended as a substitute for professional tax advice or consultation specific to your situation. We strongly encourage you to contact our team of consultants directly to receive appropriate guidance and advice.

Taxindo Prime Consulting
Tax and Transfer Pricing Calculator
Tax Calendar
×
Newsletter