Article 39 of Law Number 14 of 2002 serves as a crucial legal foundation when a Taxpayer decides to terminate a dispute amidst the litigation process. In the VAT dispute for the December 2018 Tax Period involving PT LI, the Appellant exercised their right to withdraw the registered appeal. The core conflict originally stemmed from the Respondent's correction of the VAT Tax Base (DPP). However, before a further material examination was concluded, the Appellant officially submitted a statement of withdrawal through the E-Tax Court system, which was subsequently confirmed before the Board of Judges.
The legal resolution of this application was predicated on the consent of the Respondent (DGT). According to the rules of tax procedure, a withdrawal made once the hearing has commenced requires the opposing party's approval for the case to be removed from the dispute list. The Board of Judges, in their legal opinion, stated that since the formal requirements for withdrawal were met and the Respondent raised no objections, the dispute was legally extinguished.
The implication of this decision is that the legal status reverts to the original assessment prior to the appeal, and the Taxpayer is barred from re-filing an appeal for the same subject matter. In conclusion, withdrawal is a valid litigation strategy, yet it necessitates administrative precision to ensure acceptance by the Board of Judges.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here