Tax authorities reinforce the mandatory Income Tax Article 22 withholding for plantation industry entities purchasing plantation products for industrial needs, as regulated under PMK Number 34/PMK.010/2017. In the PT PMM dispute, the primary focus lies on proving the economic substance of whether transactions were conducted individually to farmers or in aggregate to cooperative entities.
The dispute arose when the Respondent made a positive adjustment to the Income Tax Article 22 Object for the March 2019 tax period. The Respondent argued that PT PMM failed to withhold taxes on Fresh Fruit Bunches (FFB) purchases from several cooperatives. Conversely, the Taxpayer countered that cooperatives acted merely as facilitators or coordinators, while the actual sellers were individual smallholder farmers whose transaction values per individual were below the IDR 20,000,000 threshold per tax period, thus qualifying for exemption.
However, the Tax Court Panel of Judges held a different view following a documentary evidence review. The Judges found that the Cooperation Agreement (SPK) was signed between PT PMM and the Cooperative as a legal entity, not with farmers individually. Furthermore, invoices were issued by the Cooperative, and supporting documents such as weighbridge tickets or individual receipts failed to prove direct, separate transactions between the company and each farmer.
The implication of this decision serves as a warning for the palm oil industry that formal documentation, such as agreements and invoices, carries significant legal weight in determining the transaction subject. If documentation indicates transactions are with an entity (cooperative) and the total value exceeds the minimum threshold, the Article 22 withholding exemption cannot be claimed, even if payments are operationally forwarded to individual farmers.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here