The Tax Court Bench annulled the Defendant's decision rejecting the application for the cancellation of a VAT Tax Collection Letter (STP) regarding Article 14 (4) KUP penalties for PT GHEI's delayed Tax Invoice issuance. This dispute centers on the implementation of Article 36 (1) (c) of the KUP Law regarding the authority to waive sanctions for compliant taxpayers.
The Defendant argued that a 2% penalty of the Tax Base (DPP) is an absolute legal consequence for violating formal obligations. Conversely, PT GHEI asserted that all taxes due had been paid on time, meaning the administrative error resulted in no loss of state revenue. They viewed the rejection of their request as an oversight of their consistent compliance history.
The Board of Judges emphasized that Article 36 (1) (c) provides discretionary power to cancel sanctions for the sake of justice. The Judges assessed that since the principal tax had been settled, purely formal administrative sanctions could be annulled. The Court asserted that tax enforcement must balance compliance with business continuity, especially when no bad faith is found.
This ruling encourages Taxpayers to be proactive in pursuing lawsuits against disproportionate sanctions. For tax authorities, it serves as a reminder to consider the General Principles of Good Government (AAUPB). Substantive justice remains a priority in Indonesian tax disputes, transcending mere administrative formality.
In conclusion, the Tax Court’s decision reinforces that "No Revenue Loss" is a powerful argument. When the state’s financial rights are protected, technical administrative slips should not be used to impose crippling financial burdens on good-faith business actors.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here
tpc.consulting 
tpc.consulting 
info@taxindo.co.id