The dispute regarding the classification of VAT-exempt supplies being reclassified as self-collected VAT originated from PT TI's inability to present original BC 2.7 source documents during the audit due to a fire. The tax authority imposed a positive correction of the VAT Taxable Base (DPP) amounting to IDR 594,821,369.00, arguing that without original documents, facilities under Government Regulation No. 85 of 2015 could not be granted. The Respondent applied Article 26A paragraph (4) of the KUP Law to invalidate photocopy evidence submitted during the objection process.
The core of this legal conflict lies in the tension between administrative formalism and material truth. PT TI argued that the transfer to PT PEI in the Bonded Zone was a factual reality supported by invoices, packing lists, and valid Bonded Zone permits for both parties. Although the original BC 2.7 documents were destroyed, other supporting evidence cumulatively demonstrated that the transaction substantively met the requirements for VAT non-collection facilities.
In its consideration, the Board of Judges stated that the existence of a BC 2.7 document is not the sole determinant of the validity of tax facilities. The Judges were convinced of the fire incident based on authentic police evidence and assessed that other supporting evidence (goods flow and commercial documents) sufficiently proved the inter-Bonded Zone transfer. This resolution prioritizes economic substance over single-document formality.
An analysis of this verdict shows the importance of backup archiving systems (digitalization) for Taxpayers facing force majeure. The implications of this decision emphasize that the Tax Court consistently applies the "substance over form" principle, where Taxpayers' rights do not automatically lapse due to technical administrative constraints as long as the material truth can be convincingly proven.
'A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here'