The dispute involving CV BAM provides a landmark precedent regarding administrative fairness. The taxpayer was penalized IDR 93.5 million for failing to issue VAT Invoices in 2019, despite not being a VAT-Registered Person (PKP) at that time.
The tax authority argued that any delivery of Taxable Goods (BKP) must be accompanied by an invoice for formal compliance. However, CV BAM pointed out a legal paradox: as a non-PKP in 2019, they were strictly prohibited from issuing invoices. Under Article 39A of the KUP Law, a non-PKP issuing an invoice is a criminal offense, creating a situation where the taxpayer was essentially forced to choose between a fine and a jail sentence.
The Panel of Judges ruled that sanctions under Article 14 (4) of the KUP Law are exclusively for those who hold PKP status. Since CV BAM only became a PKP in 2022, the court found the 2019 penalty to be legally contradictory. Furthermore, the court highlighted that since the audit resulted in a Nil Tax Assessment (SKP Nihil), there was no loss to state revenue, rendering the sanction groundless.
This ruling emphasizes that legal certainty and fairness must prevail over administrative discretionary power. It protects non-PKP taxpayers from being trapped by illogical administrative demands. For businesses, this confirms that as long as they operate according to their actual tax status, they cannot be penalized for not fulfilling obligations that only apply to registered entities.
The Tax Court's decision restores logic to tax enforcement. It reaffirms that administrative duties cannot override the fundamental status of a taxpayer or compel them to violate criminal provisions. This is a significant step toward a more just and predictable tax environment for growing businesses in Indonesia.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here
tpc.consulting 
tpc.consulting 
info@taxindo.co.id