Operating revenue disputes are frequently triggered by data discrepancies between customs documents and accounting records. In the case of PT SB, the DGT issued a positive correction of Rp 391.6 million after comparing Export Declaration (PEB) values with Annual Tax Returns.
The tax authority utilized the exchange rate on the customs document date as the standard for material truth. PT SB countered that the discrepancy was purely a foreign exchange difference between the time of sales recognition in the General Ledger and the rates used in export documents. They argued that no actual unreported economic gain existed.
The Board of Judges emphasized that material truth must rely on mutually supporting evidence. By examining commercial invoices, sales ledgers, and comprehensive reconciliation tables, the Board found that PT SB had recorded all transactions accurately. The discrepancy was ruled as a mathematical byproduct of different exchange rate systems rather than unreported revenue.
This ruling confirms that as long as a Taxpayer can logically prove document flow and rate reconciliation, corrections based solely on customs values can be annulled. For exporters, administrative order is not just a compliance task—it is the key to successfully defending revenue recognition in the Tax Court.
In conclusion, the Court canceled the DGT's correction, favoring the substance of the accounting records over formalistic customs comparisons. This case serves as a vital reminder for corporations to maintain tight synchronization between their operational export data and their financial reporting systems.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here
tpc.consulting 
tpc.consulting 
info@taxindo.co.id