The legal dispute between PT TKU and the Directorate General of Taxation (DGT) culminated in a petition to annul a Corporate Income Tax Assessment Notice (SKPKB) issued through the verification mechanism. The core conflict arose when the Plaintiff argued that the verification procedure used by the Defendant lacked a legal basis because the verification provisions in Government Regulation (PP) 74/2011 had been invalidated by Supreme Court Ruling Number 73P/HUM/2013. The Plaintiff contended that any legal product resulting from the verification process was legally flawed and void ab initio, as it contradicted the principle of legal certainty in the KUP Law, which only recognizes "audit" terminology.
However, the Defendant countered by emphasizing the principle of non-retroactivity. The contested SKPKB was issued in late December 2013, whereas the Supreme Court Ruling that invalidated the verification regulations was only handed down in mid-2014 and became administratively effective long after the tax assessment was issued. The Tax Court Panel of Judges ultimately agreed with the Defendant, stating that the validity of an administrative legal product must be assessed based on the regulations in force at the time the product was issued.
This legal resolution confirms that the annulment of a regulation by the Supreme Court does not automatically invalidate previously finalized tax assessments. The impact analysis of this decision highlights the importance for taxpayers to understand the timeline of the rule of law and not solely rely on the annulment of regulations at the judicial review level if the DGT's administrative actions were completed before the ruling existed. In conclusion, the Plaintiff's lawsuit was dismissed because the verification process at that time still held valid legal standing temporally.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here
tpc.consulting 
tpc.consulting 
info@taxindo.co.id