Transfer pricing disputes frequently center on the debate between using the interquartile range versus the median point. In the case of PT SMI, the Board of Judges reaffirmed that tax authorities do not possess absolute authority to adjust profits to the median point as long as the Taxpayer's profitability remains within a valid comparable arm's length range.
The conflict originated when the Respondent rejected the Petitioner’s Transfer Pricing Documentation (TP Doc) and established a 13.84% median as the new profitability benchmark. However, a detailed analysis during the trial revealed that the Petitioner's NCP of 7.25% was actually within the comparable interquartile range. In its consideration, the Board of Judges stated that any re-determination of transfer prices must respect the arm's length thresholds established in technical regulations. Consequently, PT SMI's victory serves as a vital precedent, confirming that compliance with the interquartile range is the primary legal protection for Taxpayers in affiliate transactions.