Winning Transfer Pricing Appeals: Challenging the Validity of Comparable Selection and Relevance of Affiliated Transactions

Tax Court Appeal Decision | Annual Corporate Income Tax | Fully Granted

PUT-003721.15/2020/PP/M.XIB Year 2025

Taxindo Prime Consulting
Tuesday, April 21, 2026 | 08:53 WIB

00:00

Optimized with Google Chrome

Winning Transfer Pricing Appeals: Challenging the Validity of Comparable Selection and Relevance of Affiliated Transactions

Methodological Flaws in TNMM: Analyzing PT OSM's Transfer Pricing Victory

Tax authorities frequently employ the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) on an aggregate basis to adjust the profits of taxpayers deemed to fall below industry averages. However, Tax Court Decision Number PUT-003721.15/2020/PP/M.XIB Year 2025 reaffirms that the application of TNMM must satisfy strict comparability criteria.

The Conflict: Aggregate Benchmarking vs. Market Reality

The dispute originated when the Respondent adjusted the operating profit margin (OPM) under the guise of the Arm's Length Principle (ALP), using a commercial database to find peer companies.

Metric	Respondent (DGT) Position	Petitioner (PT OSM) Position
Operating Profit Margin (OPM)	Adjusted to 3.36% (Based on 6 peers)	Maintained at 0.93% (Actual)
Methodology	Aggregate TNMM on total profit.	Segmentation required (Greater than 75% Independent).

Judicial Resolution: The Failure of FAR Analysis

The Board of Judges ruled that the Respondent failed to prove that the selection of comparable companies adhered to the principles of comparability (FAR analysis). The Board emphasized that the presence of massive independent transactions should indicate that the entity's profit is influenced more by free-market mechanisms than by transfer price manipulation.

Fairness Testing (ALP) ↔ Precise FAR Comparison + Transaction Segmentation

Independent Transactions > 75% → Market-Driven Profitability

Implications for Taxpayers

PT OSM's victory proves that arguments regarding methodological flaws can invalidate corrections worth hundreds of billions of rupiah. This case highlights several essential strategies when facing a transfer pricing audit:

Robust TP Documentation: Functional analysis and meticulous transaction segmentation are the primary keys in facing a transfer pricing audit.
Database vs. Reality: Economic substance must take precedence over mere statistical figures pulled from commercial databases.
Outcome: The Board ordered the total cancellation of the Respondent's correction, confirming that the profit aligned with the arm's length principle.

A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here