Tax authorities frequently employ the "taxable-deductible" principle as a tool to disallow business expenses where no tax withholding has been performed. However, Tax Court Decision Number PUT-013851.15/2021/PP reaffirms that formal compliance with PMK-02/PMK.03/2010 regarding nominative lists for promotion expenses is the primary determinant in promotion cost deductibility disputes.
The core conflict in this case involves the Respondent's rejection of PT EVI's promotion expenses totaling IDR 4.69 billion. The Respondent argued that these costs were not listed on tax invoices and lacked evidence of income tax withholding. The Respondent insisted that if an expense constitutes income for another party, accompanying tax evidence is mandatory. The Petitioner countered by stating that the sole requirement for promotion expenses is a valid nominative list, as specifically regulated by the Minister of Finance.
In its resolution, the Board of Judges stated that the additional requirements imposed by the Respondent—such as inclusion in tax invoices—lacked a solid legal basis. The Board emphasized that disputes over withholding tax (Article 21/23) must be separated from disputes over expense deductibility (Corporate Income Tax). As long as the expenses are genuinely for generating, collecting, and maintaining income (3M) and supported by a nominative list, they are fiscally valid.
This analysis demonstrates that Taxpayers must be meticulous in preparing nominative lists for promotion expenses starting from the tax return filing stage. PT EVI's victory proves that robust administrative compliance can override a tax auditor's subjective interpretation of the taxable-deductible principle. A valid nominative list is not merely a formality but a primary legal shield to defend a company's expense burden.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here