Tax authorities often determine VAT base corrections based on revenue equalization with Corporate Income Tax (CIT) returns, yet this decision reaffirms that numerical differences due to internal reclassification journals do not automatically create new taxable objects. The PT SI case serves as an important precedent regarding the necessity of comprehensive accounts receivable flow tests.
The dispute arose when the Respondent made a positive correction of IDR 8.46 billion based on discrepancies in receivable accounts. The Respondent assumed these discrepancies represented unreported sales. Conversely, PT SI argued that the difference resulted from net-off journals or reclassifications between receivable accounts for internal management purposes, which did not constitute actual sales transactions.
The Board of Judges conducted an in-depth examination of the General Ledger and subsidiary ledgers. They found that the mutations were indeed reclassification journals, further supported by third-party confirmations from PT AHM and PT SIM. The flow test results proved that the ending balance matched the evidence, rendering the Respondent's assumption of unreported deliveries groundless.
This ruling underscores the critical importance of maintaining subsidiary ledgers and customer correspondence. The Board gave significant weight to formal evidence such as balance confirmations. PT SI's victory demonstrates that while equalization is a valid audit method, it cannot stand alone without material evidence of a legal delivery event.
Bookkeeping accuracy and the ability to reconstruct accounting journals in court are the primary keys to overturning presumptive corrections. Taxpayers are advised to prepare detailed reconciliation tables between CIT turnover and the VAT base to mitigate risks at the litigation level.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here
tpc.consulting 
tpc.consulting 
info@taxindo.co.id