This dispute over Article 26 Income Tax withholding on offshore interest focuses on the application of the substance over form principle and the timing of tax liability during a debt-to-equity swap. The Tax Authority corrected the Tax Base (DPP) by IDR 1,246,333,333.00, arguing that interest remained payable as long as the administrative process of converting debt into capital was not fully completed under corporate law.
The core of the conflict began when PT RW converted all remaining debt to its affiliate in India into equity participation based on a Circular Resolution of Shareholders and a Notarial Deed in late 2019. The Respondent (DGT) maintained the adjustment, claiming that until the approval letter from relevant authorities was issued, the loan status and its interest obligations existed for tax purposes. Conversely, the Petitioner emphasized that since the signing of the conversion deed, the legal debtor-creditor relationship had legally ended and transformed into capital ownership, meaning no interest object remained for tax withholding.
The Board of Judges, in its resolution, opined that the Petitioner had presented strong material evidence in the form of a valid notarial deed and shareholder resolutions. The Board emphasized that the essence of the transaction was a change in financial instruments from liability to equity. Since there were no further cash flows or provision for interest payments after the conversion date, imposing Article 26 Income Tax on the converted value lacked a solid legal basis. The final verdict granted the Petitioner’s appeal in its entirety.
This ruling carries significant implications for taxpayers, highlighting that timely legal documentation is key in debt restructuring transactions. Legally, converting debt to capital terminates all interest obligations attached to the principal. In conclusion, tax certainty must align with the underlying private law reality, provided the transaction is supported by authentic and competent evidence.