The Director General of Taxes (DGT) corrected interest expenses and affiliated interest income, alleging a violation of the Arm's Length Principle under transfer pricing regulations. The tax authority argued that PT JPSI did not meet the "financial distress" criteria because it recorded a commercial profit, thus requiring shareholder loans to carry market interest rates. However, the court proceedings revealed another dimension of the company's financial health that went beyond mere profit and loss figures.
The core of this conflict centered on the interpretation of Article 12, paragraph (1) of PP 94/2010. The DGT insisted that "financial distress" only occurs if a company suffers losses. Conversely, the Taxpayer proved that their liquidity position was severely threatened, with current liabilities far exceeding current assets. Without interest-free funding from shareholders, the company's operations would have been paralyzed. The Board of Judges agreed with the Taxpayer, emphasizing that financial distress analysis must be conducted comprehensively through financial ratios (such as the current ratio), rather than solely looking at current year profits.
This legal resolution provides certainty that interest-free shareholder loans are a legal facility as long as the cumulative criteria in PP 94/2010 are met. The Judges' decision to cancel all interest corrections proves that the essence of mutual aid within the capital structure of a liquidity-struggling company must be recognized fiscally. Consequently, taxpayers need to strengthen the documentation of financial ratio analysis in their Transfer Pricing Documentation (TP Doc) to mitigate similar risks in the future.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here
tpc.consulting 
tpc.consulting 
info@taxindo.co.id