Warning! Failing to Challenge Last Year's Tax Audit Results Could Jeopardize Your Current Year's COGS.

Tax Court Appeal Decision | Annual Corporate Income Tax | To Reject the Appeal/ Lawsuit

PUT-006646.15/2020/PP/M.XIA for 2025

Taxindo Prime Consulting
Tuesday, May 12, 2026 | 14:54 WIB
00:00
Optimized with Google Chrome
Warning! Failing to Challenge Last Year's Tax Audit Results Could Jeopardize Your Current Year's COGS.

Tax Lawsuit Analysis: PT BAI and the Critical Consistency of Inventory Balances in COGS

The dispute over Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) amounting to IDR 13.38 billion at PT BAI highlights the critical importance of beginning inventory balance consistency, which must refer to the legally binding (inkracht) closing inventory balance of the previous year. The tax authority implemented a positive adjustment to COGS due to discrepancies in beginning and ending inventory values that were not synchronized with previous tax audit results and Audited Financial Statements.

The Conflict: Inventory Discrepancies and Recognition of GIT/WIP

The core conflict centered on the Respondent's rejection of the Petitioner's beginning inventory value, which did not align with the agreed-upon 2015 audit results. Furthermore, the Respondent included Goods In Transit (GIT) and Work In Progress (WIP) into the 2016 ending inventory based on the Petitioner's Audited Financial Statements, whereas the Petitioner argued these components should not yet be recognized as inventory since risks and rewards had not fully transferred.

Judicial Consideration: The "Inkracht" Principle and Accounting Consistency

The Board of Judges, in their legal consideration, emphasized that the 2015 closing inventory value, for which the Taxpayer did not file a legal appeal, legally becomes the valid 2016 beginning inventory. Regarding GIT and WIP, the Board found the Petitioner inconsistent in applying its accounting policies, where the Petitioner recognized project revenue but failed to recognize the related inventory. The Petitioner also failed to provide evidence of shipping terms (incoterms) to support its arguments.

Implications: The Weakness of Inconsistent Bookkeeping

This decision confirms that administrative compliance in previous audit processes has ongoing implications for subsequent years. Inconsistencies between internal bookkeeping, Audited Financial Statements, and Tax Returns (SPT) represent a significant weakness that is difficult to overcome in court without robust supporting evidence such as shipping documents or specific contracts.

Final Conclusion: Taxpayers must ensure that every figure reported in the SPT has a strong correlation with the Audited Financial Statements and previous audit results. Negligence in contesting past findings or inconsistencies in inventory presentation will weaken your legal position.

A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here


May 15, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | Annual Corporate Income Tax | Partially Granted

PUT-013714.15/2021/PP/M.IVB Year 2025

May 15, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | Annual Individual Income Tax | Partially Granted

PUT-001541.15/2019/PP/M.IIIA Year 2020

May 15, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | PPN | Fully Granted

PUT-003023.16/2024/PP/M.XA Year 2025

May 15, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | PPN | Partially Granted

PUT-001773.16/2019/PP/M.IIIA Year 2020

May 15, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | PPN | Fully Granted

PUT-003025.16/2024/PP/M.XA Year 2025

May 15, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | PPN | Partially Granted

PUT-001774.16/2019/PP/M.IIIA Year 2020

May 15, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | PPN | Partially Granted

PUT-001771.16/2019/PP/M.IIIA Year 2020

May 15, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | Income Tax Articles 23/26 (Final) | Fully Granted

PUT-001253.13/2024/PP/M.VA Year 2025

May 15, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | Income Tax Articles 23/26 (Final) | Fully Granted

PUT-001257.13/2024/PP/M.VA Year 2025

May 15, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | PPN | Fully Granted

PUT-001768.16/2019/PP/M.IIIA Year 2020

Article More Details
May 04, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting | Naufal Afif, M.Ak., BKP (B) | Lilik F Pracaya, Ak., CA., ME., BKP (C)

Coretax | Tax Payment and Refund | PYSTT

April 13, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Coretax Pembetulan SPT | Delta SPT | KUP

Taxindo Prime Consulting (TPC) is a firm specializing in tax, accounting, business, and business law consulting.
Taxindo Prime Consulting (TPC) is established as a trusted strategic partner, providing comprehensive solutions in tax consulting, accounting, business development, and business law. Driven by a commitment to integrity and professionalism, TPC is dedicated to delivering more than just standard consultation; we provide education, tactical advice, and concrete solutions. Our services are meticulously designed to analyze and resolve clients' tax and business challenges with objectivity, in-depth insight, and full independence, ensuring both regulatory compliance and long-term business sustainability.
OFFICE
Mega Plaza Building 12th Floor
Jl. H.R. Rasuna Said Kav C-3 Jakarta 12940

Phone :
+62 21 521 2686
+62 817 001 3303

Email :
info@taxindo.co.id
Copyright © 2026 Taxindo Prime Consulting

All content on this website is provided solely for general informational and educational purposes. This information is not intended as a substitute for professional tax advice or consultation specific to your situation. We strongly encourage you to contact our team of consultants directly to receive appropriate guidance and advice.

Taxindo Prime Consulting
Tax and Transfer Pricing Calculator
Tax Calendar
×
Newsletter