PT Bounty Segar Indonesia (BSI) successfully won a dispute regarding the creditability of Input Tax on the acquisition of capital goods, specifically factory machinery and equipment worth IDR 3.5 billion. This dispute is significant as it tests the consistency of Article 16B paragraph (3) of the VAT Law in conjunction with Supreme Court Ruling Number 70P/HUM/2013 for the animal feed industry, which receives VAT exemption facilities.
The core of the conflict stems from the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) correction, which insisted that Input Tax on capital goods could not be credited because it was used to produce animal feed, whose delivery is exempt from VAT. The DGT adhered to the "matching cost against revenue" principle, which limits tax credits if the output is not subject to VAT. Conversely, the Taxpayer argued that animal feed is a Strategic Taxable Good (BKP Strategis). Based on the highest legal precedent from the Supreme Court, the right to credit Input Tax on capital goods remains intact even if the final sale is facilitated by a VAT exemption.
The Board of Judges agreed with the Taxpayer's arguments in their legal considerations. The Judges emphasized that Supreme Court Ruling Number 70P/HUM/2013 shifted the status of certain industrial commodities back to Taxable Goods. Consequently, the restrictions in Article 9 paragraph (8) letter b of the VAT Law are no longer relevant for capital goods used in the production process of strategic taxable goods. The Board stressed that fairness for manufacturing players must be prioritized by not burdening productive assets with tax costs.
The implications of this ruling provide legal certainty for strategic industry players that investments in factory machinery and equipment can still be optimized through VAT restitution mechanisms. This decision confirms that a "VAT Exempt" facility on the final product does not automatically invalidate the right to credit Input Tax on capital goods, as long as the goods are categorized as strategic items according to the Supreme Court's ruling.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here