Disputes over Article 26 Income Tax on constructive dividends are often a major concern for multinational enterprises engaged in related-party transactions below market price. In the case of PT Oleochem & Soap Industri (OSI), the Respondent imposed a secondary adjustment of IDR 1.8 billion as an implication of sales price corrections to Pacific Inter-Link Sdn. Bhd.
The tax authorities argued that the price difference essentially constituted profit retained overseas and must be characterized as a dividend. However, a sharp duality of arguments emerged:
| Party | Core Argument |
|---|---|
| Respondent (DGT) | Utilized Article 18 paragraph (3) and OECD guidelines to recharacterize the transaction into a dividend subject to withholding tax. |
| Petitioner (PT OSI) | Indonesian regulations in 2018 did not explicitly govern secondary adjustments. Furthermore, commercial losses under the LLC Law made dividend distribution legally impossible. |
The Board of Judges provided a crucial resolution by emphasizing the accessory nature of secondary adjustments. While the concept of constructive dividends is legally grounded, its application in transfer pricing is heavily dependent on the primary adjustment. Since the Board overturned the correction on PT OSI's revenue in the Corporate Income Tax dispute, the claim of unfairly shifted profits was rendered legally void.
PT OSI's victory serves as an important precedent that secondary adjustments are not independent. This ruling reaffirms that without evidence of actual profit shifting, authorities cannot enforce taxes on "imaginary dividends."
Key Takeaways for Taxpayers: