This Administrative Error Leads to Appeal Rejection: Lessons from the PT TSP Case

Tax Court Decision | Income Tax Article 22 (Non-Final) | Appeal | To Reject the Appeal/ Lawsuit

PUT-003031.11/2024/PP/M.VIA Of 2025 – 3 June 2025

Taxindo Prime Consulting | Adv. Muhammad Faiz Nur Abshar, S.H. - Lilik F Pracaya, AK., CA., ME., BKP (C)
Wednesday, April 08, 2026 | 09:10 WIB
00:00
Optimized with Google Chrome
This Administrative Error Leads to Appeal Rejection: Lessons from the PT TSP Case

Article 22 Tax Credits and Book-Entry Failures: Analyzing the PT TSP Dispute

The tax credit dispute involving Article 22 Income Tax between PT TSP and the Directorate General of Taxes (DJP) underscores the high risk of administrative failure in the book-entry transfer (Pbk) mechanism. The core conflict began when PT TSP claimed a tax credit of IDR 3,950,517,891.00, but the payment was recorded under the name and Tax ID (NPWP) of PT GBU in the State Revenue Module system. Although PT TSP could materially prove that the funds originated from their bank account, the DJP maintained the correction.


The Core Conflict: Procedurally Defective Book-Entry Transfer (Pbk)

The DJP argued that without a valid Pbk procedure, tax payments under another party's name cannot be recognized as a tax credit for a different taxpayer. Conversely, PT TSP's attempt to resolve this through Pbk faced a fatal obstacle: the application was rejected because the statement letter from PT GBU was signed by an individual not registered as an official executive in the AHU database or the company's annual tax returns. This discrepancy in management data rendered the Pbk process procedurally defective.

Judicial Resolution: Formalities as the Decisive Factor

The Panel of Judges, in its legal considerations, emphasized that taxation formalities carry decisive weight in cases involving the transfer of rights over tax payments. Despite evidence of the cash flow, the successful recognition of a tax credit depends heavily on strict compliance with administrative requirements as stipulated in PMK Number 242/PMK.03/2014. Since the requirement for authorized signatures in the Pbk application was not met (unable to show the deed of appointment of the Director representing the company), the Panel of Judges ruled to reject PT TSP's appeal.

Strategic Implications: Corporate Data Validity is Absolute

The implication of this decision for the business community is a stark reminder that administrative precision and the validity of corporate management data in state systems are absolute. An error in writing the NPWP on a billing code is not merely a technical issue easily fixed; it is a legal challenge that requires a formally perfect Pbk procedure. Failure to ensure the authority of the party signing supporting documents can result in the loss of tax credit rights worth billions of rupiah.

A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here
Adv. Muhammad Faiz Nur Abshar, S.H.
Adv. Muhammad Faiz Nur Abshar, S.H.
Tax Business Consultant and Lawyer

May 19, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | Income Tax Article 23 (Non-Final) Fully Granted

PUT-007984.12/2020/PP/M.IVB for 2025

May 19, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | Annual Corporate Income Tax | Partially Granted

PUT-005042.15/2021/PP/M.XB Year 2025

May 19, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | Annual Corporate Income Tax | Partially Granted

PUT-004949.15/2020/PP/M.IIIA Year 2022

May 19, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | PPN | Partially Granted

PUT-003307.16/2023/PP/M.XVA Year 2025

May 19, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | PPN | Fully Granted

PUT-004304.16/2021/PP/M.IIA Year 2024

May 19, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | PPN | Fully Granted

PUT-004308.16/2021/PP/M.IIA Year 2024

May 19, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | PPN | Fully Granted

PUT-004898.16/2023/PP/M.IIIB Year 2024

May 19, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | Income Tax Articles 23/26 (Final) | Partially Granted

PUT-005076.12/2023/PP/M.XVA Year 2025

May 19, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | Income Tax Article 26 (Non-Final) | Fully Granted

PUT-005259.13/2024/PP/M.XIIIB for 2025

May 19, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | PPN | Fully Granted

PUT-005995.16/2024/PP/M.XVIA for 2025

Article More Details
May 16, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting | Lilik F Pracaya, Ak., CA., ME., BKP (C)

May 04, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting | Naufal Afif, M.Ak., BKP (B) | Lilik F Pracaya, Ak., CA., ME., BKP (C)

Coretax | Tax Payment and Refund | PYSTT

Taxindo Prime Consulting (TPC) is a firm specializing in tax, accounting, business, and business law consulting.
Taxindo Prime Consulting (TPC) is established as a trusted strategic partner, providing comprehensive solutions in tax consulting, accounting, business development, and business law. Driven by a commitment to integrity and professionalism, TPC is dedicated to delivering more than just standard consultation; we provide education, tactical advice, and concrete solutions. Our services are meticulously designed to analyze and resolve clients' tax and business challenges with objectivity, in-depth insight, and full independence, ensuring both regulatory compliance and long-term business sustainability.
OFFICE
Mega Plaza Building 12th Floor
Jl. H.R. Rasuna Said Kav C-3 Jakarta 12940

Phone :
+62 21 521 2686
+62 817 001 3303

Email :
info@taxindo.co.id
Copyright © 2026 Taxindo Prime Consulting

All content on this website is provided solely for general informational and educational purposes. This information is not intended as a substitute for professional tax advice or consultation specific to your situation. We strongly encourage you to contact our team of consultants directly to receive appropriate guidance and advice.

Taxindo Prime Consulting
Tax and Transfer Pricing Calculator
Tax Calendar
×
Newsletter