Disputes regarding Article 26 Income Tax withholding on dividends often hinge on administrative formalities, as experienced by PT SLI in its appeal against the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT). The tax authority adjusted the tax base for Final Income Tax by IDR 129,616,280.00, arguing that the taxpayer failed to meet the administrative requirements for applying the Indonesia-Thailand Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). The core of the conflict was the taxpayer's alleged inability to provide a validated Certificate of DGT during the objection stage, leading the Respondent to apply the 20% domestic rate instead of the preferential treaty rate.
PT SLI strongly refuted the adjustment by demonstrating that the reporting obligation for the Certificate of Residence (CoR) from its Thai parent company had been fulfilled through the electronic reporting system (e-DGT). During the trial, the Petitioner presented valid electronic receipts and the DGT Form certified by the Revenue Department of Thailand. In its legal consideration, the Board of Judges emphasized that as long as the administrative documents are available, valid, and reported in accordance with PER-25/PJ/2018 procedures, the taxpayer's right to enjoy the DTAA rate cannot be annulled due to technical issues in document submission at previous stages.
The resolution of this case resulted in the full approval of PT SLI's appeal, with the Board of Judges overturning the Respondent's correction because it was materially and formally proven that the dividend recipient was a foreign tax subject entitled to DTAA benefits. The implication of this ruling provides legal certainty for taxpayers that the tax administration's digitalization system (e-DGT) serves as powerful authentic evidence in court. In conclusion, meticulous archiving of electronic receipts and document validation from treaty partner countries is the primary key to winning international tax disputes at the litigation level.