A business entity that receives interest payments from a factoring financing mechanism is explicitly stipulated as a recipient of income excluded from the Withholding Tax (WHT) Article 23 regime, in accordance with the mandate of Article 23 section (4) letter h of the Income Tax Law in conjunction with Minister of Finance Regulation Number 251/PMK.03/2008. The dispute between PT PGL (Appellant) and the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT/Appellee) in this Tax Court Decision provides a crucial juridical affirmation regarding the application of this exemption, especially when the DGT raises doubts about the completeness of the Taxpayer's supporting documents.
This case centers on the correction of the WHT Article 23 Tax Base (DPP) for the October 2021 Tax Period, arising from a difference in the equalization between the interest expense in the Taxpayer's Income Statement and the reported WHT Article 23 withholding slips. The DGT found an interest payment of Rp66,471,769.00 recorded as an expense by the Appellant, but no corresponding WHT Article 23 deduction was made.
The DGT based its correction on the administrative fact that the Appellant failed to prove the WHT Article 23 exemption with complete and verified documents, such as the full Factoring Agreement, chronological documents, and contested journal vouchers. The DGT argued this was purely a dispute of evidence. However, the Appellant countered that, in substance and legality, the interest payment was part of a Working Capital Agreement by Way of Factoring Financing with PT AF, a financing company with legal status under OJK supervision. WHT Article 23 on this interest is exempted because the recipient is a business entity providing loans/financing services.
The Panel of Judges examined the status of PT AF and confirmed that the company met the criteria as a factoring financing business entity that legitimately performs the function of channeling loans/financing as regulated in PMK-251/2008. The Panel opined that the existence of the legitimate Notarial Deed of Agreement was sufficient to prove the substance of the transaction. Adhering to Article 23 section (4) letter h of the Income Tax Law, the Panel concluded that the interest payment to the factoring company was juridically not subject to WHT Article 23 withholding. Consequently, the DGT's correction was overturned, and the Panel granted the Appellant's Appeal in its entirety.
This decision provides significant legal certainty for Taxpayers utilizing non-bank financing services, such as factoring. The primary implication is the reaffirmation of the substance over form principle in determining the object of WHT, where the legal status of the income recipient (as a regulated financing company) is recognized as having extremely strong weight by the Panel of Judges, even when the DGT questions the completeness of supporting documentation. The lesson for Taxpayers is the importance of having solid primary legal documents (agreements and notarial deeds) which can be used to override administrative doubts that might arise from secondary documents like journal vouchers.
The WHT Article 23 dispute over factoring financing interest resulted in a win for the Taxpayer, confirming that the WHT Article 23 exemption regulated in PMK-251/2008 is absolute as long as the income recipient is a legitimate financing business entity. This decision serves as a key reference for factoring practices in Indonesia.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here.
tpc.consulting 
tpc.consulting 
info@taxindo.co.id