Legal certainty in Tax Court proceedings is paramount, as demonstrated in the dispute between PT NES and the Directorate General of Taxes. This decision underscores that negligence in fulfilling formal requirements, particularly regarding the accumulation of lawsuit objects and the scope of authority in a Special Power of Attorney, can be fatal to a case's admissibility. The case originated from PT NES’s lawsuit against the rejection of a VAT Assessment (SKPKB) rectification for July 2018, which ultimately hit an absolute procedural wall in the eyes of the Board of Judges.
The core of this legal conflict centered on two formal violations raised by the Defendant. First, the Plaintiff included two distinct dispute objects—the VAT SKPKB and the Rectification Response Letter—within a single lawsuit petition, which is explicitly prohibited by Article 40, paragraph (6) of the Tax Court Law. Second, the Defendant challenged the legal standing of the Plaintiff's counsel. Although Mr. Kurniawan held a valid legal counsel license, his Special Power of Attorney failed to grant specific authority to sign the lawsuit petition, limiting his role only to attending hearings and providing testimony.
The Board of Judges maintained a strict stance on formal tax provisions in their legal opinion. The Judges emphasized that each single decision must be filed in a separate lawsuit petition to ensure the clarity of the dispute object. Regarding the legal counsel issue, the Board argued that a Special Power of Attorney must adhere to the principle of certainty in the scope of authority. Since the document did not explicitly mention the right to sign the lawsuit, the petition was deemed to have been signed by an unauthorized party (error in persona).
The implications of this ruling serve as a stern warning for Taxpayers to conduct internal audits of litigation documents before submission. This procedural failure resulted in the merits of the case, involving billions of rupiah in VAT Input Tax and Compensations, being entirely disregarded by the Board. Practically, Taxpayers must ensure that Special Powers of Attorney are drafted with meticulous detail, covering every legal action to be taken, and ensuring the "one decision, one lawsuit" principle is strictly followed without exception.
In conclusion, victory in a tax dispute is not only determined by the strength of material arguments but heavily depends on the administrative discipline of procedural law. This decision reinforces that formal requirements are the primary, non-negotiable gateway in the Indonesian tax judicial system.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here
tpc.consulting 
tpc.consulting 
info@taxindo.co.id