The dispute between PT BHI and the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) highlights the complexity of recognizing interest income on non-performing loans within Branch Profit Tax (BPT) calculations. The primary focus of this case is the DGT's interpretation of declining interest receivable balances as objects of Income Tax Article 26(4). The core conflict lies in the application of cash versus accrual basis, where the DGT assumed the reduction in interest balances was a cash receipt, while PT BHI asserted it resulted from debt write-offs or assignments.
In its legal consideration, the Board of Judges prioritized material truth by conducting a thorough examination of the company's bank statements. Consequently, it was proven that no fund inflows from debtors occurred regarding the NPL interest. The Court emphasized that without realized payments, the correction of interest income could not be upheld. This decision provides legal protection for the banking sector against taxes on income that has not been economically received.
The implication of this ruling for financial service providers is the critical importance of synchronizing banking accounting records with fund flow evidence to withstand tax equalizations. PT BHI successfully overturned the majority of the corrections due to the strength of specific transaction supporting documents.