Strategy to Win Royalty Disputes: Why Historical Brand Evidence Outweighs Mere Profitability Assessments?

Tax Court Appeal Decision | Annual Corporate Income Tax | To Reject the Appeal/ Lawsuit

PUT-012952.13/2021/PP/M.XVIB for 2025

Taxindo Prime Consulting
Wednesday, May 13, 2026 | 14:57 WIB
00:00
Optimized with Google Chrome
Strategy to Win Royalty Disputes: Why Historical Brand Evidence Outweighs Mere Profitability Assessments?

Transfer Pricing Analysis: IP Existence and the Validity of PT MI’s Royalty Expenses

The Director General of Taxes (Respondent) reclassified royalty payments made by PT MI to ACE into dividends, citing a failure to prove the existence and economic benefit of the intangible property. The Respondent utilized a Transfer Pricing approach focusing on the decline in the Taxpayer's operational profitability as an indicator of the absence of economic benefit from the licensed know-how and formulas. However, this argument was refuted by legal facts showing that the "M" brand was legally registered and possessed inherent commercial value in the products sold.

The Conflict: Profitability Ratios vs. Factual IP Existence

During the trial, it was revealed that the dispute centered on differing interpretations of Article 12 of the Indonesia-Singapore Tax Treaty and the arm's length principle. The Respondent deemed the royalty payments improper due to the lack of IP registration documents in Singapore, while PT MI emphasized that rights to trademarks and trade secrets are protected by law without requiring formal registration in every jurisdiction, provided their existence can be factually proven through production use.

Judicial Opinion: Royalties as Legitimate Gross Income Deductions

The Board of Judges provided a crucial legal opinion, stating that the existence of IP ownership by the affiliate was proven through the 2010 trademark sale and purchase deed. The Board also emphasized that the economic benefit of royalties is embedded in the products produced and marketed under that brand, making the royalty costs a legitimate deduction from gross income rather than a disguised profit distribution (dividend). This decision confirms that a decline in profitability does not automatically eliminate the existence of economic benefits from intellectual property.

Strategic Takeaway: PT MI's victory provides an important lesson: always document ownership evidence and the historical acquisition of IP. The Board of Judges prioritized legal substance and the direct link between costs and revenue over volatile financial ratio analysis.

A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here


August 05, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | PPN | Partially Granted

PUT-007016.162024PPM.XVIIIB Year 2025

August 05, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | Income Tax Articles 23/26 (Final) | Partially Granted

PUT-007041.122024PPM.XVIIIB Year 2025

August 05, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | Annual Corporate Income Tax | Partially Granted

PUT-007042.122024PPM.XVIIIB Year 2025

August 05, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | Annual Corporate Income Tax | Partially Granted

PUT-007239.15/2023/PP/M.XIVA Year 2024

August 05, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | PPN | Fully Granted

PUT-007248.162023PPM.XIVA Year 2024

August 05, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | Income Tax Articles 23/26 (Final) | To Reject the Appeal/ Lawsuit

PUT-009965.132022PPM.IIB Year 2025

August 04, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | Annual Corporate Income Tax | Fully Granted

PUT-010300.252023PPM.XIIIB Year 2025

August 04, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | Annual Corporate Income Tax | Partially Granted

PUT-010310.15/2021/PP/M.VIIIA Year 2025

August 04, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | PPN | Fully Granted

PUT-010314.16/2021/PP/M.VIIIA Year 2025

August 04, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | PPN | Partially Granted

PUT-010315.162021PPM.VIIIA Year 2025

Article More Details
August 24, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting | Adv Muhammad Faiz Nur Abshar, S.H. - Lilik F Pracaya, Ak., CA., ME., BKP (C)

August 24, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting | Adv Muhammad Faiz Nur Abshar, S.H. - Lilik F Pracaya, Ak., CA., ME., BKP (C)

August 24, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting | Adv Muhammad Faiz Nur Abshar, S.H. - Lilik F Pracaya, Ak., CA., ME., BKP (C)

Taxindo Prime Consulting (TPC) is a firm specializing in tax, accounting, business, and business law consulting.
Taxindo Prime Consulting (TPC) is established as a trusted strategic partner, providing comprehensive solutions in tax consulting, accounting, business development, and business law. Driven by a commitment to integrity and professionalism, TPC is dedicated to delivering more than just standard consultation; we provide education, tactical advice, and concrete solutions. Our services are meticulously designed to analyze and resolve clients' tax and business challenges with objectivity, in-depth insight, and full independence, ensuring both regulatory compliance and long-term business sustainability.
OFFICE
Mega Plaza Building 12th Floor
Jl. H.R. Rasuna Said Kav C-3 Jakarta 12940

Phone :
+62 21 521 2686
+62 817 001 3303

Email :
info@taxindo.co.id
Copyright © 2026 Taxindo Prime Consulting

All content on this website is provided solely for general informational and educational purposes. This information is not intended as a substitute for professional tax advice or consultation specific to your situation. We strongly encourage you to contact our team of consultants directly to receive appropriate guidance and advice.

Taxindo Prime Consulting
Tax and Transfer Pricing Calculator
Tax Calendar
×
Newsletter