The correction of business turnover through transfer pricing instruments for new companies often overlooks the economic reality of the start-up business cycle, which naturally incurs operational losses. In this decision, the Panel of Judges overturned the Directorate General of Taxation (DJP)'s correction, which had equated the profit profile of PT SGI with established comparable companies without considering high fixed costs that had not yet generated revenue, otherwise known as uncontributed costs.
The dispute focused on the use of the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) with the Net Cost Plus Mark-up (NCPM) indicator, which DJP had adjusted from -36.99% to a median of 7.96%. PT SGI argued that the incurred losses were a logical consequence of being a market entrant since 2019. Large operational fixed costs (uncontributed costs) could not be immediately covered by income margins because the customer base was still in a developmental stage.
The Panel of Judges emphasized the importance of a tax avoidance risk analysis, as mandated by PER-22/PJ/2013. The Judges assessed that DJP failed to prove any tax-saving motive, as 93% of the transactions were conducted with domestic affiliates subject to the same Corporate Income Tax rate (22%). The Panel's recognition of start-up cost adjustments serves as an important precedent that comparability analysis must address the substance of functional conditions and specific risks.
The conclusion of this decision provides a breath of fresh air for start-up entrepreneurs to remain confident in documenting their operational losses, provided they are supported by a valid economic analysis. Adjustments for costs that do not contribute directly to profit in the early years of operation are a legitimate step in transfer pricing techniques to achieve more accurate comparability with stable companies.