Disputes over the deductibility of social infrastructure development costs often become a focal point in Corporate Income Tax audits, as seen in the case of PT BAP. The conflict centered on a IDR 16.15 billion correction of Vihara construction costs, where the Tax Authority argued that PT BAP was not the direct employer in the construction contract, rendering the contribution a non-deductible cash donation. Conversely, the Taxpayer asserted that, in economic substance, they bore the construction costs for a religious facility to benefit the local community, fulfilling the requirements of the Income Tax Law.
The Board of Judges, in its legal consideration, prioritized the principle of substance over form. The Judges ruled that despite the administrative involvement of a foundation, the material fact was the physical existence of the facility and the actual expenditure for social infrastructure. This decision confirms that religious facility construction costs are deductible expenses if they meet Government Regulation 93/2010 criteria. However, the court upheld the correction on retention costs due to lack of evidence regarding the accrual period, highlighting that precise cost cut-off documentation remains vital.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here