Tax examiners frequently disallow sales returns from non-VAT registered (Non-PKP) buyers, citing failure to meet formal requirements under PMK-65/PMK.03/2010. In the case of PT SNS, the Respondent corrected the returns because the return notes lacked tax invoice serial numbers and were not reported to the buyer’s tax office. However, the economic substance confirmed that the goods were physically returned and accurately recorded in the company’s inventory and accounting systems.
The core conflict lies in the clash between rigid administrative formalities and the material facts of the transaction. The Petitioner argued that the limitations of the e-SPT system, which lacks a specific menu for Non-PKP returns, should not strip a Taxpayer of their right to reduce the VAT base. Furthermore, operationally, non-VAT registered buyers often lack the technical expertise to issue perfect return notes as strictly required by tax regulations.
The Board of Judges issued a progressive legal opinion, stating that administrative errors or omissions by the buyer should not negate the fact that a physical return occurred. The Judges emphasized that as long as the flow of goods and supporting documents (such as return delivery notes and stock cards) can be proven, the correction must be overturned to ensure justice for the seller who has lost the sales value.
This decision reaffirms the "substance over form" principle in VAT disputes. Taxpayers are encouraged to maintain robust physical evidence for all Non-PKP returns despite electronic reporting hurdles. The Petitioner’s victory in this matter provides legal certainty that a buyer's administrative flaws do not automatically invalidate the reduction of business turnover for the seller.
tpc.consulting 
tpc.consulting 
info@taxindo.co.id