The application of the historical cost principle was key to PT SI's victory in maintaining the deductibility of share sale losses amounting to USD 3,364,251. The Respondent issued a correction based on the argument that the shares' book value had already decreased accounting-wise due to the equity method, thus claiming no loss existed or was deductible upon sale. However, the Petitioner successfully convinced the Board of Judges that Article 6 paragraph (1) letter d of the Income Tax Law grants Taxpayers the right to deduct losses from the transfer of assets held for earning income.
The essence of this dispute lies in the differing treatment of investment values. In commercial accounting standards, the equity method requires investors to record their share of a subsidiary's profit or loss as an increase or decrease in the investment's value. However, tax authorities often overlook that Indonesian tax law does not recognize these value fluctuations until a realization event (asset disposal) occurs. This lack of synchronization between commercial data and fiscal reality often triggers administrative corrections that lack a legal foothold in the Income Tax Law.
The Board of Judges emphasized that the equity method is a commercial accounting standard not adopted by Indonesian tax law for determining the tax book value of assets. Fiscally, the investment value in shares is unaffected by the subsidiary's profit or loss prior to the actual realization of the transfer. This decision serves as an important precedent for holding companies, confirming that losses from transferring subsidiary shares are deductible based on the difference between the selling price and the historical acquisition cost.
A vital lesson for Taxpayers is to consistently apply the acquisition cost in fiscal books, even if the equity method is used for commercial purposes. By maintaining a clear audit trail of the historical acquisition cost, companies possess a strong legal defense during investment equalization disputes. This ruling provides legal certainty that the right to deduct real losses is protected as long as it aligns with the fiscal realization principle.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here