The tax authority imposed a significant correction of IDR 16.7 billion on PT DH Tbk's Input Tax for the February 2014 tax period, claiming that mining services are categorized as non-VATable objects. This dispute centers on the Respondent's restrictive interpretation of Article 4A paragraph (3) letter g of the VAT Law, which classifies certain mining services as non-Taxable Services (non-JKP). However, court facts revealed that PT DH Tbk acted as a mining service contractor providing services to mine concession holders, rather than conducting independent mining of natural resources which are classified as non-Taxable Goods (non-BKP).
The legal conflict intensified as the Respondent insisted that the services provided by the Petitioner were inseparable from the coal mining activity itself, thus following the status of coal as a non-Taxable Good. Conversely, the Petitioner argued that as a contractor, their services are general Taxable Services for which Output VAT had already been collected. The inconsistency of the Respondent, who acknowledged the Output VAT but rejected the Input Tax credit, became a crucial point in the Taxpayer's objection.
In its legal considerations, the Board of Judges emphasized that the VAT exemption in Article 4A of the VAT Law only applies to specific mining services performed by contractors under profit-sharing schemes (such as in the oil and gas industry), not to general contractor services providing operational support. The Board ruled that since the Petitioner's service delivery is a VATable service, according to basic VAT principles, the Input Tax directly related to these business activities must be granted for credit.
This decision provides legal certainty for the mining support services industry, ensuring that the right to claim Input Tax credits remains protected as long as there is a VATable delivery.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here