Director General of Taxes Decision Number KEP-00372/KEB/WPJ.04/2018 is the central point in the formal dispute involving PT QS (Applicant) regarding VAT for the November 2014 Tax Period. Article 35 paragraph (2) of the Tax Court Law strictly mandates a three-month period for filing an appeal, a preclusive deadline that cannot be negotiated without a legally valid reason. The core of the conflict is rooted in differing interpretations of the date the decision letter was received due to a change in company domicile that was not followed by formal and written administrative procedures.
The DGT (Respondent) sent the Objection Decision to the Applicant's registered address, while PT QS argued that the letter was only physically received at the new location on November 19, 2018. However, the court facts revealed that the letter had been received at the old address on November 16, 2018. The Single Judge, in their legal consideration, emphasized that without a written notification of change of address to the tax authorities, the registered address remains the valid legal domicile for the delivery of official correspondence.
The implications of this administrative negligence were fatal; the calculation of the appeal period began on November 16, 2018, and ended on February 15, 2019. Since PT QS only sent the appeal letter via mail on February 16, 2019, the Single Judge rendered a verdict of "Appeal Not Admissible" (Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard). This case provides a crucial lesson for Taxpayers regarding the importance of orderly domicile administration and strict monitoring of litigation deadlines, where a delay of just one day can eliminate the Taxpayer's constitutional right to obtain material justice.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here
tpc.consulting 
tpc.consulting 
info@taxindo.co.id