The Respondent's adjustment regarding the Luxury Goods Sales Tax (PPnBM) Base for August 2018 against PT PKN was entirely overturned by the Tax Court. The core of this dispute lies in determining the accrual point of PPnBM on down payments (booking fees and installments) for "The Residence at SRJ" apartment units, where the Respondent claimed tax was due upon payment receipt, while the Petitioner argued that the signing of the Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) is the legal delivery point.
The Respondent based its correction on Article 11 paragraph (2) of the VAT Law and Article 17 paragraph (2) of Government Regulation (PP) 1/2012, which states that tax is due when payment is received before the delivery of Taxable Goods (BKP). Conversely, PT PKN argued that the delivery of immovable BKP, such as apartments, only occurs when the legal right to use or possess the property is transferred via PPJB. Furthermore, PT PKN emphasized that PMK 86/2019 increased the PPnBM threshold to IDR 30 billion; since the transaction values were below this and the PPJB was signed after July 1, 2019, the PPnBM obligation should be nullified.
The Board of Judges provided a legal opinion fully supporting PT PKN's argument by referring to Article 17 paragraph (3) letter b of PP 1/2012. The Judges emphasized that for immovable goods, delivery is deemed to occur at the signing of the deed that transfers rights (PPJB). The receipt of down payments in 2018 did not establish legal certainty of delivery as the units were still under construction and funds were tentative. This decision confirms that regulatory changes via PMK 86/2019 protect Taxpayers who have not legally transferred rights before the regulation's effective date.
Critical Strategic Insight: The recognition of the tax accrual point must not ignore the civil law substance regarding the transfer of ownership rights. For the property industry, ensuring that PPJB documentation aligns with the momentum of regulatory threshold changes is essential to mitigating tax risks.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here