The dispute between PT FWT and the DGT focused on the definition of religious services excluded from VAT under Article 4A paragraph (3) letter f of the VAT Law. The case challenges whether a pilgrimage organizer's entire operation is inherently exempt or if it contains taxable commercial elements.
The DGT corrected the VAT base for November 2018 after finding that PT FWT acted as an intermediary, applying mark-ups on airline tickets, hotels, and visas. While the Petitioner argued these were inseparable from the Umrah ritual, the Defendant classified them as travel agency services subject to MoF Regulation No. 121/PMK.03/2015.
The Tax Court emphasized that a PPIU license is not an automatic tax shield. The Judges ruled that hotel and ticket brokering for profit is purely a commercial travel service. Furthermore, the court addressed the ex-officio VAT registration, stating that tax obligations arise the moment objective and subjective requirements are met, regardless of when the official registration certificate is issued.
This decision forces the pilgrimage industry to restructure how they bill clients. To protect the tax-exempt status of religious services, organizers must clearly differentiate between pure religious services and supporting commercial services. Failure to separate these components risks having the entire gross turnover treated as the taxable VAT base.
In conclusion, the Court upheld the DGT's correction, reinforcing that "religious services" have strict legal boundaries. Profit margins derived from travel intermediary services do not enjoy VAT-exempt status, highlighting the importance of economic substance in determining tax liability.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here
tpc.consulting 
tpc.consulting 
info@taxindo.co.id