The dispute began when the tax authority reclassified goods deliveries made by PT EHI from being non-taxable (outside the customs area) to taxable deliveries within Indonesia. The core conflict centered on the interpretation of material facts regarding the physical location of the goods at the time of delivery; the Respondent (DGT) argued that the Petitioner failed to provide authentic evidence of export or proof that the goods remained outside Indonesian sovereign territory.
Conversely, PT EHI countered that these transactions followed an international drop-shipment scheme where goods were shipped directly from overseas vendors to overseas customers without ever crossing Indonesian customs borders.
In its legal opinion, the Board of Judges affirmed that based on invoices, purchase orders, and packing lists, it was legally proven that the goods were physically located outside the customs area during the transaction, thus failing the cumulative requirement of "delivery within the customs area."
This ruling carries significant implications for international distribution companies, reinforcing that robust documentation of goods flow is the primary key to defeating corrections on transactions that substantively fall outside Indonesia's tax jurisdiction.