The fundamental application of Article 9 paragraph (8) letter b of the Value Added Tax Law (VAT Law) stipulates that Input VAT cannot be credited if the underlying acquisition of Taxable Goods (BKP) or Taxable Services (JKP) does not have a direct connection with business activities that result in VAT-able supplies. In the case study of Tax Court Decision Number PUT-003528.16/2024/PP/M.XVA Tahun 2025, the Panel of Judges explicitly rejected the appeal filed by PT FI, which disputed an Input VAT correction amounting to IDR 1,255,170. The core of this dispute revolved around the Taxpayer’s failure to prove a sufficient correlation between the Input VAT arising from certain expenditures and the Taxpayer's VAT-output-generating activities.
The central conflict in this case arose from the different interpretations of the concept of nexus or direct connection. The Respondent (Directorate General of Taxes/DGT) adhered to a narrow definition, where Input VAT can only be credited if it can be specifically and directly traced to the VAT-able supply. Conversely, the Appellant argued that the expenses constituted reasonable and ordinary business costs necessary to operate the business as a whole, and therefore the related Input VAT should be creditable. The Taxpayer's argument emphasized a substance-over-form approach, where all business expenditures ultimately aim to generate VAT-able revenue.
In its resolution, the Panel of Judges firmly placed the burden of proof entirely on the Appellant. The Panel legally confirmed that Article 9 paragraph (8) letter b of the VAT Law is a mandatory provision, and in this case, the Taxpayer failed to present convincing evidence—such as internal documentation or usage reports—that explicitly linked the costs of acquiring the BKP/JKP to the VAT-able supplies. The inability to overcome the DGT's challenge regarding the non-creditable nature of the Input VAT became the decisive factor in the ruling.
This decision, which rejected the Taxpayer's appeal, reaffirms the principle that in Input VAT disputes, formal documents alone are insufficient. The implication for corporate taxpayers is the need to establish an extremely stringent VAT management system. Every Input VAT credit must be supported by documentation that is not only formally valid (Tax Invoice) but also substantially strong, capable of demonstrating a clear and rational nexus to the Output VAT. Failure to map this causality will result in the Input VAT becoming an irrecoverable expense, transforming it from a tax credit into a business cost. This conclusion reinforces the importance of proactive tax litigation risk management, starting from the transaction documentation phase.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here
tpc.consulting 
tpc.consulting 
info@taxindo.co.id