The Directorate General of Taxes often applies the "substance over form" doctrine to reclassify sales price reductions as objects of withholding tax. In the dispute between PT SD and the Respondent, the pivotal issue was whether the reduction in export invoice value due to the use of "metalbox" packaging constituted a pure discount or a rental fee for assets as defined under Article 26 of the Income Tax Law. The Tax Office issued a positive correction, arguing that the exporter's utilization of assets owned by a foreign entity triggers a withholding tax obligation, even in the absence of direct cash outflows.
The conflict intensified when the Tax Office interpreted the debit entry in the sales revenue account as a reflection of rental expenses. Conversely, PT SD demonstrated that the metalboxes were provided and paid for directly by the foreign buyer to a local vendor in Indonesia. The company merely provided a price reduction because it no longer incurred the cost of standard wooden pallets.
In its consideration, the Tax Court emphasized that without evidence of rental payment flows or a lease agreement between the exporter and the asset owner, unilateral reclassification by tax authorities is legally flawed. This ruling provides legal certainty that trade discounts supported by clear export contract terms do not constitute Article 26 Income Tax objects.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here
tpc.consulting 
tpc.consulting 
info@taxindo.co.id