The dispute over VAT collection in the pilgrimage industry has reached a significant milestone in the case of PT FWT vs. the DGT. The conflict centers on IDR 2.16 billion worth of services claimed as non-taxable religious acts but reclassified by the authority as taxable commercial transactions.
PT FWT argued that their PPIU license automatically exempted all their services under Article 4A of the VAT Law. However, the DGT corrected this, proving that the transactions were Business-to-Business (B2B) engagements with other travel agents. In the eyes of tax law, providing tickets and hotels to other businesses for a fee strips the service of its "religious character," turning it into a taxable commercial travel service.
The Tax Court Judges emphasized that VAT exemptions for religious services only apply if delivered directly to pilgrims as an integrated package. Trial evidence showed PT FWT handled only administrative and accommodation logistics for corporate clients (other agents). Since they did not serve the jemaah directly, they failed the cumulative requirements for exemption, leading the Court to reject the lawsuit entirely.
This decision is a warning for all PPIU players in Indonesia. Tax compliance now hinges on documentary evidence and contractual clarity regarding the end recipient of the service. Holding a ministry license is no longer enough; organizers must strictly separate their B2B wholesale lines from their direct B2C pilgrimage services to avoid massive fiscal corrections.
In conclusion, the Court’s ruling reinforces that economic substance prevails over legal formalities. For a service to be VAT-exempt, the link between the organizer and the pilgrim must be direct and documented. Any intermediation involving mark-ups or fees between agents remains a taxable event under the VAT regime.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here
tpc.consulting 
tpc.consulting 
info@taxindo.co.id