This dispute focuses on the positive correction of the VAT Base (DPP) for the June 2017 period amounting to IDR 128,026,196,270.00, conducted by the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) through cash and accounts receivable equalization methods. The DGT applied tax audit techniques based on Article 13 paragraph (1) of the KUP Law to test the compliance of PT TDASI's reported business turnover. The core conflict lay in the Taxpayer's inability to provide adequate reconciliation details between the Corporate Income Tax Return data and bank account mutations during the audit process.
In its consideration, the Board of Judges took the position that this VAT dispute is a derivative dispute that materially depends on the outcome of the Corporate Income Tax dispute for the same tax year. Given that the correction originated from identical data sources, the legal resolution regarding the value of deliveries subject to self-collection followed the main ruling on business turnover. Analytically, this underscores the importance of cross-tax reconciliation data consistency. The implication of this decision for Taxpayers is the absolute obligation to maintain the integrity of cash flow documentation from the initial inquiry stage (SP2DK) to prevent systemic correction accumulation at the appeal level.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here