Countering "Gross-Up" Turnover Corrections in Tax Court: Lessons from the PT SBS Case

Tax Court Decision | Tax Lawsuit | Lawsuit | To Reject the Appeal/ Lawsuit

PUT-005344.99/2024/PP/M.IA Year 2025

Taxindo Prime Consulting
Monday, April 13, 2026 | 09:29 WIB
00:00
Optimized with Google Chrome
Countering "Gross-Up" Turnover Corrections in Tax Court: Lessons from the PT SBS Case

Indirect Audit Risks and the Gross-Up Technique: Analyzing the PT SBS Case

The PT SBS case serves as a stern warning for taxpayers regarding the risks of indirect audit methods used by the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT). The dispute centers on the correction of the VAT Tax Base (DPP) performed through a gross-up technique on unreported purchase data. The DGT utilized a profit margin ratio approach to determine the delivery value, a move deemed valid by the Board of Judges despite the Taxpayer's objections that it lacked evidence of actual transactions.


The Core Conflict: Mathematical Calculations vs. Actual Flow

The core conflict lies in the differing methodologies for determining turnover. The Defendant (DGT) discovered input tax invoices from counterparties that were not recorded by the Plaintiff. Based on these findings, the Defendant performed a gross-up using an 8.9% profit margin derived from the Taxpayer’s own Corporate Income Tax Return. Conversely, the Plaintiff argued that the delivery of Taxable Goods (BKP) must be proven by actual cash and goods flow, rather than mere mathematical calculations.

Judicial Opinion: The Validity of "Other Methods"

In its legal opinion, the Board of Judges emphasized that when a Taxpayer fails to maintain complete bookkeeping, Tax Examiners are authorized to use "other methods" to calculate gross circulation according to PMK 15/PMK.03/2018. The Judges considered the purchase gross-up technique a rational method supported by the Taxpayer’s internal data. Since the Plaintiff was unable to present contracts or source documents to refute the calculation, the Board decided to reject the lawsuit.

Conclusion: The Priority of Administrative Compliance

This decision underscores the importance of internal data reconciliation before filing tax returns. The implication is that taxpayers can no longer rely solely on arguments regarding the absence of transaction evidence if the DGT has employed a regulation-recognized indirect method. The key lesson is that administrative compliance in recording every goods acquisition is crucial, as any unreported purchase will be treated as capital for unreported sales (hidden turnover).

A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here

May 19, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | Income Tax Article 23 (Non-Final) Fully Granted

PUT-007984.12/2020/PP/M.IVB for 2025

May 19, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | Annual Corporate Income Tax | Partially Granted

PUT-005042.15/2021/PP/M.XB Year 2025

May 19, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | Annual Corporate Income Tax | Partially Granted

PUT-004949.15/2020/PP/M.IIIA Year 2022

May 19, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | PPN | Partially Granted

PUT-003307.16/2023/PP/M.XVA Year 2025

May 19, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | PPN | Fully Granted

PUT-004304.16/2021/PP/M.IIA Year 2024

May 19, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | PPN | Fully Granted

PUT-004308.16/2021/PP/M.IIA Year 2024

May 19, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | PPN | Fully Granted

PUT-004898.16/2023/PP/M.IIIB Year 2024

May 19, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | Income Tax Articles 23/26 (Final) | Partially Granted

PUT-005076.12/2023/PP/M.XVA Year 2025

May 19, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | Income Tax Article 26 (Non-Final) | Fully Granted

PUT-005259.13/2024/PP/M.XIIIB for 2025

May 19, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting

Tax Court Appeal Decision | PPN | Fully Granted

PUT-005995.16/2024/PP/M.XVIA for 2025

Article More Details
May 16, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting | Lilik F Pracaya, Ak., CA., ME., BKP (C)

May 04, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting | Naufal Afif, M.Ak., BKP (B) | Lilik F Pracaya, Ak., CA., ME., BKP (C)

Coretax | Tax Payment and Refund | PYSTT

Taxindo Prime Consulting (TPC) is a firm specializing in tax, accounting, business, and business law consulting.
Taxindo Prime Consulting (TPC) is established as a trusted strategic partner, providing comprehensive solutions in tax consulting, accounting, business development, and business law. Driven by a commitment to integrity and professionalism, TPC is dedicated to delivering more than just standard consultation; we provide education, tactical advice, and concrete solutions. Our services are meticulously designed to analyze and resolve clients' tax and business challenges with objectivity, in-depth insight, and full independence, ensuring both regulatory compliance and long-term business sustainability.
OFFICE
Mega Plaza Building 12th Floor
Jl. H.R. Rasuna Said Kav C-3 Jakarta 12940

Phone :
+62 21 521 2686
+62 817 001 3303

Email :
info@taxindo.co.id
Copyright © 2026 Taxindo Prime Consulting

All content on this website is provided solely for general informational and educational purposes. This information is not intended as a substitute for professional tax advice or consultation specific to your situation. We strongly encourage you to contact our team of consultants directly to receive appropriate guidance and advice.

Taxindo Prime Consulting
Tax and Transfer Pricing Calculator
Tax Calendar
×
Newsletter