The classification dispute over withholding tax under Article 23 regarding the procurement of labels and packaging materials took center stage in the ruling between PT PL and the Tax Authority. The core conflict centered on differing interpretations of "Printing Services" as regulated in PMK 141/PMK.03/2015, where the Respondent made a positive adjustment to the cost of purchasing sticker labels and cartons, deemed to contain elements of manufacturing services (moulding). The Taxpayer argued that the transaction was purely a purchase of goods (trading) from the producer, given that orders were made routinely for lubricant production needs and there was no separation of service charges in the invoice.
However, the Board of Judges held a different view and provided a resolution that strengthened the Respondent's position. In its legal consideration, the Board emphasized that because the ordered items (stickers and labels) had specific specifications matching the Petitioner's design, the transaction met the criteria for printing services. Furthermore, the Petitioner's failure to present a separate breakdown of material costs from services in the billing documents led to the entire gross payment value being designated as an object of Article 23 Income Tax.
The impact analysis of this ruling underscores the importance of unbundling or explicitly separating material and service values in invoices to avoid taxation on the total transaction value. In conclusion, administrative precision in documenting transaction evidence is a determinant factor in winning service qualification disputes.